Fantasy File—Lamont Jordan: Overrated
So, how did we get here? During his time with the Jets, Jordan was understudy to Curtis Martin. In fantasy terms this meant that thousands of us were taking late-round fliers on the guy and then running kabob skewers through the knees of our Curtis Martin voodoo dolls. After a few years as a fantasy tease, Jordan signs with the Raiders, he finally gets his starting chance and blows up:
Lamont Jordan 2005: Rushing--272 carries, 1025 yards, 9 TDs
Receiving--70 receptions, 563 receiving yards, 2 TDs
A very good year. Over 1,500 total yards. Double-digit TDs. Frankly, those numbers justify a first round pick, but I don’t think he can match them this season.
Why you shouldn’t believe the hype:
1. Lamar Smith Phenomena: Remember Lamar? In 2000, Smith had 309 rushes for 1139 yards and 14 TDs for the Dolphins--all career highs. Naturally, Smith was a hot property in 2001, but only produced 968 yards and 6 TDs. As Madden would say: “Sometimes when a guy has a career year, that’s his career year”.
In 2005 Lamont Jordan had career highs in carries, yards, TDs, receptions and receiving yards--career best numbers by wide margins. Pundits ranking him in the top ten do so under the assumption that Jordan will duplicate or better these numbers. That’s a pretty big assumption. This is a guy who has never been a 300+ carry guy. He’s had only one year as the feature back, so it remains to be seen if this is a trend or a mirage. Do you want to risk your first rounder to find out?
2. New offensive coordinator Tom Walsh.
Lets review the resume of the guy who will be calling the plays for the Raider's offense this season:
The good: Walsh was with the Raiders during a span when the club went 124-88 and won the division four times.
The bad: In 1994 the Triplets defeated the Bills in the SuperBowl; Friends premieres on NBC; O.J. went for a ride in the Bronco; Kurt Cobain off'd himself;—and it was also the last year that Tom Walsh coached in the NFL…yikes.
The ugly: I’m not even kidding. Walsh got canned along with Shell in 1994 and hasn’t been in the NFL since. Walsh’s most recent gig was running a bed & breakfast.
Question: How do you feel about drafting Jordan in round one knowing that his offensive coordinator has been on a twelve year hiatus from the league? Let some other guy draft him only to have the Raiders' announce that they are installing an offense based around the Full House backfield.
3. Vertical Passing: Art Shell has come in promising to install a more vertical passing attack. Doesn’t every new Raiders’ coach promise to air it out? Its just one of those things you have to say under the circumstances, like when #1 overall draft picks claim to be excited about joining whatever team had the worst record the previous year. Anywho, there are three good reasons to believe Shell will make good on his promise. First, when Randy Moss isn’t whipping up fruit smoothies, he’s the league’s best downfield threat. Second, when people analyze Aaron Brooks they always praise his deep ball—in his case it’s a nice way of saying Brooks is horribly inaccurate. I think its a safe bet the club won't feature swing passes to the halfback this year--when your QB completes only 55% of his passes, you need some of those to be downfield. Finally, Al Davis. The only thing keeping this guy alive (aside from about a pint of blood a day and the occassional defibrillation) is the dream that he will one day see his Raiders contending again—and doing it with an aggressive vertical passing game. What does this mean for Jordan? Fewer balls his way in the passing game and maybe even fewer touches as pass/run ratio skews.
4. Did I mention Aaron Brooks? One of my favorite football writers is KC Joyner “the football scientist”. Joyner watches every game and logs statistics of his own creation. For QBs he has created a “bad decision metric”—a stat for every poor throw, read or decision a QB makes. Someday Joyner may rename the BDM in honor of Aaron Brooks. This is a guy known for throwing a pass backwards in ’04, and infuriating the fans with his nonchalant attitude after tossing a pick. The guy was benched in ’05 in favor of Todd Bouman for crying out loud. I don’t think relocating to the Bay Area will help any. After stinking it up in the Raiders most recent preseason game he told the sideline reporter that he really didn’t need to work on anything. Really Aaron? How about your crappy completion percentage (career 56.4%)? Or last year’s 13/17 TD-to-INT ratio? No? Okay, carry on. If Brooks holds to form, the Raiders will struggle and there will be fewer carries for Jordan as they play from behind.
5. Madden factor: Imagine you’re doing building a team from scratch in Madden. If you rank the RBs 1-10, is Jordan on the list? I didn’t think so. He just doesn’t come to mind when you are thinking high-ceiling or game-breaking talent. Amongst 2005 top fifteen rushers, only Jordan and Willis McGahee finished with an average yards-per-carry of under 4.0 (both were at 3.8). His longest rush of the season was 26 yards (lowest amongst the top 20 rushers in ’05) and he only had 4 rushes over 20 yards. The reality is that Jordan is a serviceable back who had a big year because the team fed him the ball both on the ground and through the air. Circumstance, rather than talent, was the driving factor behind his ’05 season and circumstances have changed.
